 |
LHR HOME
>
Library HR
>
Library Staff Manual
>
Promotion and Appointment of Librarians
Promotion and Appointment of Librarians
revised 5/30/08
INTRODUCTION
Librarians at the University of Michigan hold academic appointments and are part
of the faculty of the University. As such, they have the responsibility to determine
the rules of governance under which they may seek to advance their careers as
librarians. The policies and procedures that follow describe the process whereby
librarians obtain their appointments and are promoted within the University Library
System.
The foundation of these procedures is a focus on personal growth and achievement
rather than on the responsibilities of a particular position. It acknowledges
that in a large research library there are many paths toward professional excellence.
It assumes an underlying premise that each librarian must take responsibility
for the direction and pace of his/her own career. In a system as rich and diverse
as this academic library, these procedures must provide flexibility for advancement
for the many specialists and managers that comprise the University Library.
The current iteration of the promotion and appointment procedures for librarians
is an attempt to improve on the preceding guidelines. It strives to create a system
that provides incentives for promotion throughout a career, that removes the existing
barriers to promotion, and that is comparable with governance systems for librarians
at other institutions.
GENERAL PROCEDURES
Librarians at the University of Michigan are classified into one of four ranks:
Assistant Librarian, Associate Librarian, Senior Associate Librarian, and Librarian.
These ranks represent stages in the professional development of the librarian's
career.
General characteristics of these four stages are as follows:
Assistant Librarian: beginner; little experience; developing identity and
specialization; beginning professional activities and contributions to library/university
community; demonstrates basic skills as a general librarian; works in the context
of a unit doing work that is well-defined, short-term, limited in scope, supervised;
contributes to planning and managing within a unit; exerts some influence and
impact within the unit and larger organization.
Associate Librarian: some experience; competent specialist; contributes
to professional organizations and activities (editing, co-authoring, member of
committees, etc.) and active on committees and service groups; demonstrates broader
skills, greater independence, speaking and writing for varying audiences with
only some review; works in context of area of specialization doing complex yet
well-defined tasks and projects both within unit and with other units; plans and
manages within unit; exerts greater influence and impact within unit and library.
Senior Associate Librarian: experienced; shows growth and achievement in
specialty; contributes and leads in professional activities (research and publication,
chairing committees, initiating activities, etc.) and with service groups having
a wider scope within the library, university, and/or community; displays breadth
and depth of skills, working with an array of audiences, application, and level
of formality; works in context of area of specialization in unit and in library
at large; plans and manages within unit and among units; exerts significant influence
and impact within unit, other particular areas of the library, and possibly the
profession at large.
Librarian: broadly experienced; "master" specialist; excellent contributions
to profession and specialty, and in service to library, university, and community;
demonstrates skills in all aspects of academic librarianship; works with minimal
supervision in area of specialization, within and beyond the library, and with
colleagues throughout academe; plans and manages for area of responsibility and
library at large; broad and sometimes final influence and impact.
The ranking for every librarian is based on how closely the individual matches
the characteristics of that rank. These characteristics are described for each
rank in nine categories:
1. Education, experience
2. Specialization, expertise
3. Independence, responsibility, judgment
4. Organizational skills, planning, supervision, management
5. Communication
6. Creativity, initiative, vision, entrepreneurship
7. Influence, impact
8. Professional activities
9. Service
The descriptions for each category found in the document, "Criteria for Promotion
and Appointment of Librarians" (see Appendix 1) offer a more complete picture
of an academic librarian operating at a particular stage in his/her professional
development. The descriptions allow for flexibility and choice for each individual
in the development of his/her career. It is understood that no one person is likely
to be at the same level in all categories, nor be active in all possible areas
within a category. It is the composite picture of the individual, which ultimately
determines rank. It is expected that the criteria will need review as the profession
continues to change. (See Appendix 4.)
PROMOTION REVIEW COMMITTEE
The Promotion Review Committee (PRC) is responsible for all tasks associated with
the classification of librarian staff who request promotions (with the exception
of the University Librarian and the Associate University Librarians). The PRC
also works with members of Library Human Resources (LHR) to develop and present
informational workshops about the classification and promotion processes to librarian
staff on a regular and frequent basis.
Membership
The Promotion Review Committee consists of six voting members, four being elected
and two being appointed by the University Librarian. Two immediate past members
serve as alternates. In the unusual event that an additional alternate is needed,
s/he will be one of the two preceding past members of the PRC. The Director, Administrative
Services acts as a resource person. The voting members and alternates are distributed
as evenly as possible among the three upper ranks of librarians, among Public
Services, Technical and Access Services, Digital Library Initiatives, Administrative
Services, Library Administration, and among different library units. These librarians
must hold a continuing appointment or a term appointment of at least 50% FTE that
extends beyond the term of Committee service. A member completing a three-year
term followed by a one-year term as an alternate will be eligible for election
or appointment for another term after an interval of four years.
Committee members serve for three-year terms, with a fourth year of availability
provided in order to serve as an alternate voting member when needed. The two
people assisting in the classification of a new hire are drawn from this group
of librarians (see section on "Rank at Appointment"). Two new members are added
to the Committee each year. An incomplete term of an elected member is filled
through a special election; an incomplete term of an appointed member is filled
by the University Librarian.
ELECTION
In September of each year, the University Librarian appoints a Nominating Committee
consisting of three former members of the Promotion Review Committee. The Nominating
Committee solicits nominations from librarian staff and prepares a slate of candidates
to present for election in October. The Nominating Committee has the responsibility
for presenting a slate of candidates that promotes diversity and balance within
the Promotion Review Committee. It is recommended that the Nominating Committee
specifically request nominations from librarian members of the Library Diversity
Committee. Nominating Committee members confer with potential candidates and their
supervisors regarding the investment of time and energy involved in the work of
the PRC. Elections are conducted by the University Librarian’s office. New members
join the PRC at the beginning of January.
PROMOTION
Any incumbent at the Assistant, Associate, and Senior Associate level may submit
a request for promotion to the next rank. This request may be submitted after
three years of successful employment at a particular rank or in any subsequent
year. This includes full- and part-time librarians and librarians holding successive
term appointments. The librarian initiates the procedure after being notified
of eligibility by Library Human Resources or in any year thereafter, according
to her/his own belief that sufficient change, growth, and development have occurred
to warrant reassessment of rank. Promotion at the University of Michigan University
Library is an entirely voluntary system established to provide flexibility and
choice for each individual in the development of his/her career and to reward
professional growth and accomplishment.
The librarian is notified of eligibility by Library Human Resources by June 1,
with submission of promotion materials due December 10 (see Appendix 2). The librarian
may withdraw from the promotion review process at any time before December 10.
S/he may re-enter the review process the next year.
The documentation package must include all items from Category I and selected
or all materials from Category II as follows:
Category I: Evaluative Documentation
- Curriculum Vitae
- The librarian’s description in three to five pages of achievements and growth
accomplished since the date of appointment or the last promotion.
- The supervisor’s summary of assessments written since the date of appointment
or the last promotion.
- The supervisor’s and the unit/cluster manager’s written recommendations
for promotion.
- Names and addresses of no more than seven people who have agreed to write
letters of recommendation. Guidelines for the selection of references are
provided by LHR. Promotion requests for the upper two ranks should include
letters from references outside of the University Library.
- Job description(s) (to be used as an aid in understanding some of the accomplishments being described)
Category II: Supporting Documentation
- Samples of work that reflect the nine areas of evaluation
- Samples of kudos [i.e., unsolicited letters of praise]
- An annotated list of publications, presentations, electronic products, etc.
Other types of material may be included in the documentation package as the candidate
and supervisor deem appropriate.
The process of promotion for the supervisor involves support of the librarian
and advice throughout the process, a written summary of the librarian’s accomplishments
and growth, and a written recommendation for promotion (as listed in Category
I).
PRC receives the promotion review packet from LHR and agrees to send its recommendation
to the University Librarian by May 1. A quorum for the vote on promotion is five
members of PRC. A member of PRC may recuse her/himself from participating in a
promotion review in the following circumstances:
- in the case of a supervisor/supervisee relationship
- in the case of a personal relationship
- in the case of a conflict of interest
- in the case of a personal conflict
Similarly, a librarian being considered for promotion may request that a member
of PRC be excused from participating in the review if s/he feels that any of the
above circumstances apply. This option may be exercised once in the promotion
request.
After receiving the PRC's recommendation, the University Librarian makes the final
decision concerning promotion and notifies the candidate and his/her supervisor
of the result. In the case of a negative decision, the University Librarian meets
with the candidate and his/her supervisor to discuss this outcome. (See Appendix
2 for relevant dates.) A candidate receiving a negative decision may submit a
new request for promotion after two years.
If the candidate believes that the outcome has been negatively affected by a procedural
discrepancy in the process, s/he may appeal to the University Librarian. The University
Librarian is responsible for determining on a case-by-case basis what remedial
action, if any, is appropriate. (See Appendix 2 for relevant dates.) If the candidate
continues to have concerns, s/he may then consult the Library's grievance procedure.
RANK AT APPOINTMENT
The University Library desires to hire the best-suited librarians possible to
support research and instruction at the University of Michigan. To remain competitive,
the University Library requires an appointment system that is flexible and that
can respond quickly during the recruitment process. Rank at appointment refers
to the process of determining the classification for any librarian filling a vacant
position in the University Library.
Position descriptions for vacancies are developed by supervisors in consultation
with the Unit/Cluster Manager and/or the Associate University Librarian/University
Librarian. These parties set the available budget for the position and establish
the potential range for classification. The supervisor, in consultation with Library
Human Resources, has the option of advertising a position at one or more ranks.
When appointment is possible at more than one rank, the advertisement indicates
that the rank will be based on qualifications and experience. Applicants will
be expected to submit the usual materials (cover letter, curriculum vitae, and
the names of at least three professional references), which will be used in combination
with the interview to determine the appropriate rank when a finalist is selected.
Applicants invited for interviews will be supplied with materials by LHR explaining
the appointment process.
The supervisor, in consultation with two experienced members of the Promotion
Review Committee and the appropriate Associate University Librarian, recommends
the rank of the selected finalist to the University Librarian. The "Criteria for
Promotion and Appointment of Librarians" document (see Appendix 1) is used as
the basis for this process. The salary offer is determined, based on an equity
review conducted by LHR and in consultation with the supervisor and the Associate
University Librarian/University Librarian. The rank and salary form the basis
of the appointment offer. Upon acceptance of the offer by the finalist, as indicated
by an acceptance letter, the appointment is complete. The new librarian, including
an incumbent librarian accepting a vacant position but not advancing in rank,
may submit materials for reassessment of rank following the standard procedures
for promotion.
ENCLOSURES:
Appendix 1 -- "Criteria for Promotion and Appointment of Librarians"
Appendix 2 -- "Timeline for the Promotion Process"
Appendix 3 -- "Transition Procedures"
Appendix 4 -- "Policy Questions and Review of Promotion Criteria"
APPENDIX 1: CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION
AND APPOINTMENT OF LIBRARIANS
1. EDUCATION
Assistant Librarian: ALA-accredited master's degree; A different advanced
degree acceptable in some cases.
Associate Librarian: ALA-accredited master's degree; A different advanced
degree acceptable in some cases.
Senior Associate Librarian: ALA-accredited master’s degree; A different
advanced degree acceptable in some cases; Additional relevant graduate degree,
or progress toward one, is recommended.
Librarian: ALA-accredited master’s degree; A different advanced degree
acceptable in some cases; Additional relevant graduate degree is highly recommended.
2. SPECIALIZATION, EXPERTISE
Assistant Librarian: Is in the process of developing a professional identity
and an appropriate level of technical competence; Demonstrates general skills
and knowledge of librarianship, information management, and technology; May have
some language or subject expertise.
Associate Librarian: Demonstrates competency in a specific area of librarianship.
Senior Associate Librarian: Demonstrates expertise and continued growth
in area of specialization.
Librarian: Demonstrates significant and substantial expertise in area of
specialization.
3. INDEPENDENCE, RESPONSIBILITY, JUDGMENT
Assistant Librarian: Works under close supervision; Demonstrates independence,
responsibility, and judgment in the context of well-defined, usually unit-based
tasks, duties, and projects.
Associate Librarian: Works under general supervision; Demonstrates independence,
responsibility, and judgment in the context of area of specialization and with
varied, complex, yet well-defined projects or operations; Commits resources within
a well-defined area, makes recommendations for action, sets priorities for personal
work and possibly for others within the unit.
Senior Associate Librarian: Works under limited supervision; Demonstrates
independence, responsibility, and judgment in the context of area of specialization
and with activities that are broad-based, possibly unit-wide, and/or long-term;
Commits range of resources within area of responsibility, is accountable for success
of tasks and projects within the job assignment, sets priorities for work accomplished
in area of responsibility, makes final recommendations for commitment of resources
and action in broad areas of activity.
Librarian: Works under minimal supervision; Demonstrates highest degree
of independent responsibility, judgment, and accountability within all areas of
job assignment; Makes decisions and final recommendations that commit resources
on a long-term basis, is responsible for the consequences of personal decisions
or those made by staff in his/her area of responsibility.
4. ORGANIZATIONAL SKILLS, PLANNING, SUPERVISION, MANAGEMENT
Assistant Librarian: Successful in organizing individual tasks and specific,
well-defined projects; Contributes to unit planning and/or policy decisions; Where
there is supervisory responsibility, displays supervisory skills with support
staff working on well-defined tasks and projects; Applies managerial skills to
short-term projects or those of limited scope.
Associate Librarian: Successful in organizing and coordinating work in
complex projects and/or among functional units; Participates in planning and policy-setting
for area of specialization and for a well-defined segment of the Library (a unit
or functional units); Where there is supervisory responsibility, demonstrates
supervisory skills with staff of all levels, working on tasks involving multiple
functions, and including coaching and encouraging of staff in the growth and development
of skills; Demonstrates managerial skills in area of responsibility and with work
having moderate scope, possibly involving a unit, function, budget, and/or collection.
Senior Associate Librarian: Organizational skills evidenced by successfully
handling many (often simultaneous and conflicting) demands, utilizing whatever
resources are available, and including coordination of staff from other units
as appropriate; Manages planning process in area of responsibility and participates
in planning and policy-setting for unit, cluster, and division; Where there is
supervisory responsibility, demonstrates supervisory skills with staff of all
levels, usually involving multiple units and/or functions, and including counseling
and advising of colleagues contributing to their professional growth and development;
Manages resources effectively to accomplish duties which are usually of a larger
and more complex scope. Resources can include personnel, budgets, collections,
equipment, facilities, etc. in one or more functional units.
Librarian: Demonstrates organizational skills relating to oversight and
coordination of several complex or diverse functions, programs, and/or projects;
Participates in the formation and effective implementation of plans and policies
affecting any segment of the organization; Where there is supervisory responsibility,
demonstrates supervisory skills with all levels of staff, including responsibility
for multiple units and for making final decisions regarding personnel matters;
Counsels and mentors colleagues across divisional and institutional lines; Demonstrates
excellent leadership in the management of a broad operational area(s) or unit(s),
generally including planning, budgeting, policy- and decision-making, and supervision.
5. COMMUNICATION
Assistant Librarian: Communicates chiefly with persons within the unit
or to whom the unit directly relates; Demonstrates success with public speaking,
and with writing that is generally reviewed by supervisors; Communication is usually
task-based, such as teaching a class according to approved guidelines, or publishing
library guides, procedure manuals, bibliographies, Web pages, etc.
Associate Librarian: Communicates within and outside the Library with a
wide range of clients, including Library and University faculty, staff, and students,
colleagues, vendors, and individuals and groups of diverse backgrounds and informational
needs; Successful in speaking in various settings and levels of formality, and
on behalf of the organization within defined parameters; Written communication
may include correspondence, articles for publication, grant proposals, planning
documents, etc. many of which are reviewed by a supervisor.
Senior Associate Librarian: Communicates with a broad variety of persons
both within and outside the organization, often speaking for the functional unit
or the Library at large, effectively presenting Library policy; Exhibits flexibility
of communication in terms of audience addressed; Successful in oral communication
ranging from informal conversations with individuals and small groups to prepared
addresses and lectures; Successful in written communication which covers a wide
range of types, and which is usually not reviewed by a supervisor.
Librarian: Communicates with a broad range of contacts both within and
outside the organization, interpreting Library policy and/or professional issues
involving complex subject matter and conceptual approaches; Exhibits flexibility
of communication in terms of audience addressed, including skill and tact in difficult
situations; Demonstrates excellence in oral and written communication within a
wide range of settings and types of writings, possibly including reports of research
studies, professional or subject-based publications, or documents of library-wide
significance.
6. CREATIVITY, INITIATIVE, VISION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Assistant Librarian: Demonstrates ability and willingness to take risks
and apply creative problem solving to issues within a unit or project; Identifies
opportunities for initiating or improving services and client relations.
Associate Librarian: Demonstrates initiative, resourcefulness, and originality
of thought and approach in problem solving within limits established for the functional
unit; Investigates and proposes for implementation new methods, techniques, procedures,
and services; Identifies and acts upon opportunities for initiating or enhancing
services and client relations within scope of responsibility; Exhibits understanding
of future trends in her/his specialization; Acts as primary contact for defined
clientele; brings services to the attention of clients and colleagues.
Senior Associate Librarian: Identifies, analyzes, and resolves varied and
complex problems through application of experience, creativity, intuition, and
informed analysis; Develops, initiates, and integrates new methods, techniques,
procedures, and services in and among units; Creates environment in area of responsibility
that generates new ideas, fosters creative problem solving, and encourages staff
initiative; Applies understanding of current and future trends in specialization
and area of responsibility; Develops and manages services and client relations
within area of responsibility; Brings services and activities to the attention
of Library administration, clients, and colleagues at this and other institutions.
Librarian: Demonstrates exceptional innovative development, planning, implementation,
and problem solving skills based on experience, creativity, intuition, and informed
analysis; Proposes new services and new service approaches in a Library-wide context;
develops and implements strategies for integrating same into established policies
and procedures within broad area of responsibility; Leads staff and colleagues
in area of responsibility, demonstrating and encouraging innovative, results-oriented
thinking; Initiates, recognizes, and rewards entrepreneurial approach to project
and program development and implementation; Initiates, develops, integrates, and
oversees positive client relations within area of responsibility; Works with Library
administration and with Library and University public relations staff to publicize
activities and services to as broad an audience as appropriate.
7. INFLUENCE, IMPACT
Assistant Librarian: Influences short-range planning and decision-making
primarily within the unit; Exercises influence in the context of specific job
responsibilities and task force or committee activities; Impact of decision-making
is such that errors can be detected before adversely affecting the unit or the
Library.
Associate Librarian: Influences recommendations and decisions primarily
within the unit but may also influence Library-wide decisions and issues as a
member or chair of committees or task forces; Exerts considerable impact on programs
and tasks within the unit and may be the person principally responsible for the
success or failure of specific activities; Acts as contributor rather than final
arbiter; Contributes to Library, University, and the profession through a growing
awareness and understanding about library issues, policies, objectives, programs,
and trends.
Senior Associate Librarian: Makes final decisions and has significant influence
on issues that affect area of responsibility, including commitment of resources;
Responsible for success or failure of project activities and programmatic elements
in area of responsibility; Commits resource allocation on long-term basis; Exerts
substantial influence concerning issues, policies, objectives, programs, and trends
within the Library, University, and the profession based on a proven record of
achievement in area of specialization and a broad understanding of issues within
academic librarianship.
Librarian: Influences significant, long-range planning and decision-making,
extending to all levels of staff, internal and external clientele, and the profession,
and affecting collections, budgets, projects, programs, policies, and procedures.
May be the final authority in some or all of these areas; Serves as a leader within
the Library, the University, and the profession, exhibiting substantial breadth
and depth of understanding about library issues, policies, objectives, programs,
and trends; Impact of decision-making is substantial, demonstrable, and can be
irreversible.
8. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
Assistant Librarian: Establishes membership in professional organizations;
Attends professional conferences or workshops; Takes advantage of professional
development opportunities; May be involved at some level in research, writing,
or other relevant creative activity such as poster sessions or presentations.
Associate Librarian: Contributes to the profession, whether through professional
organization or through other efforts. Activities may include work on a committee,
task force, or other group; work on projects sponsored by professional organizations;
or activity in other professional efforts;Is involved at some level in research,
writing, publishing, or other relevant creative activity;May serve as a mentor
to new librarians, graduate students, or undergraduate students.
Senior Associate Librarian: Demonstrates professional growth by the level
of involvement or accomplishment within professional organizations or other professional
efforts; Pursues opportunities beyond the University Library in research, writing,
publishing, or other relevant creative activity, such as speaking, teaching, or
mentoring; Contributes to developments in area of specialization, demonstrating
an appropriate level of understanding of current and future trends.
Librarian: Demonstrates excellence in professional accomplishments and
contributions to the profession through work within professional and/or scholarly
organizations or mastery of the area of specialization exhibited through research
and publication, teaching, consulting work, or other relevant creative activity;
Recognized as a leader by peers beyond the University of Michigan.
9. SERVICE
Assistant Librarian: Participates as an effective member of committees
and teams, primarily within the unit.
Associate Librarian: Contributes as an effective member and/or leader of
committees and teams, primarily with groups within the Library.
Senior Associate Librarian: Serves the Library and University as an effective
member and/or leader of a team, committee, or larger organization that benefits
the Library or the University, including work with groups comprised of faculty
and staff from units throughout the University.
Librarian: Shows evidence of exceptional achievement in service that benefits
the University Library, contributes to the educational mission of the University
through University-wide activities, and/or involves a high level of public service
in the community as an extension of his/her career as a librarian.
APPENDIX 2: TIMELINE FOR THE
PROMOTION PROCESS (Revised Spring 2002)
During May:
The Promotion Review Committee and Library Human Resources hold an informational/instructional
session on the promotion process. This session is open to any interested staff
member.
By June 1:
Library Human Resources notifies those librarians newly eligible for promotion.
Their supervisors are notified at the same time.
By July 1:
Candidates notify Library Human Resources of their intent to submit a request
for promotion.
By July 15:
Librarians submit the names and addresses of references to be solicited by LHR.
September 1:
Library Human Resources mails letters to prospective references
November 1:
Reference letters are due in Library Human Resources.
By December 10:
Candidates submit their promotion materials to Library Human Resources.
January 2:
Promotion dossiers are made available to the Promotion Review Committee which
begins reviewing them.
By May 1:
Promotion Review Committee completes its reviews of promotion materials and submits
recommendations to the University Librarian.
By June 1:
The University Librarian makes the final decisions concerning promotions, and
notifies the candidates and their supervisors of the results.
By June 15:
In cases of a negative decision, the University Librarian meets with the candidate
and his/her supervisor to discuss the results.
By July 1:
If the candidate believes that the outcome has been negatively affected by a procedural
discrepancy in the process, s/he may appeal to the University Librarian.
By July 15:
The University Librarian responds to the candidate and his/her supervisor regarding
any appeal of the promotion process.
APPENDIX 3: TRANSITION PROCEDURES
How was the first PRC formed?
In mid- to late-summer of 1999, the University Librarian appointed a Nominating
Committee consisting of three or four members. The Nominating Committee solicited
nominations from librarian staff and prepared a slate of candidates to present
in October for election of four of the six-member Promotion Review Committee (two
members were appointed by the University Librarian). The initial Committee members
had staggered terms, with two members elected for a one-year term plus one year
of service as an alternate, two members for two-year terms plus one year as an
alternate, and two members for three-year terms plus one year as an alternate.
Beginning with the 2000 election, members were elected for the normal term of
three years plus one year as an alternate.
The Nominating Committee has responsibility for presenting a slate of candidates
that will promote the diversity and balance of the Committee membership. It is
recommended that the Nominating Committee specifically request nominations from
librarian members of the Library Diversity Committee. Nominating Committee members
confer with potential candidates and their supervisors regarding the investment
of time and energy that will be involved in the work of the Promotion Review Committee.
Elections are conducted by the University Librarian’s office. The first Promotion
Review Committee is formed during December 1999. The Nominating Committee takes
responsibility for orientation of the Promotion Review Committee in January 2000,
with the work of the Committee beginning in February 2000.
How was the second PRC formed?
In September of 2000, the University Librarian appointed a Nominating Committee
consisting of three members drawn from the 1999 Nominating Committee members and
the two outgoing members of the Promotion Review Committee. In subsequent years,
the Nominating Committee will be drawn from former members of the Promotion Review
Committee.
How are PRC's procedures established?
Using the "Criteria for Promotion and Classification of Librarians," the first
Promotion Review Committee develops operating procedures for the review and is
responsible for documenting these for future Committee members. It is expected
that operating procedures will evolve over the first few years of the Promotion
Review Committee's existence and that evolving operations also will be documented
and passed on to future members.
How will the first PRC's workload be managed?
All librarians retain their current rank until they are granted promotion upon
review. If the workload of PRC requires, applications will be reviewed first for
those librarians who have become eligible in the current year and second on the
basis of seniority and/or pending retirement.
APPENDIX 4: Policy Questions
and Review of Promotion Criteria
For questions and issues of policy that arise, and for review of the promotion
criteria, the Promotion Review Committee (PRC) proceeds as follows.
- The PRC prepares an explanation of the questions needing resolution regarding
policy or the promotion criteria. The PRC may also draft a recommendation
for resolution of the issue.
- This document is presented to the Forum Executive Committee and is shared
with the University Librarian.
- The Forum Executive Committee has three options:
- to endorse the recommendation as presented.
- to appoint a task force to study the issue and submit a report to the
Forum Executive Committee.
- to refer the question to the Forum as a whole for discussion and resolution.
- Once the Forum Executive Committee or the Forum as a whole has acted, the
resulting recommendation is sent to the University Librarian for his/her approval.
|
 |
|